On a hot summer day, after two long
hours of nagging lecture we had a short refreshment break. To overcome the
exhaustion by the lecture, I clicked on the news section of my country in my
laptop to be informed of the situations there. News flashing that day was about
the demand for caste-based reservation for Patel community, raised by Hardik
Patel. Clips of his provoking speech addressing a huge crowd were displayed. I
wondered how a face from the crowd emerged overnight, and was greatly eminent
in some few days, who could now confront Prime Minister.
Deeply engaged in the thinking
process, I didn’t notice a fellow American student, sitting next to me was watching
the videos. Suddenly he asked curiously breaking my thought processes - “Is this
person a celebrity or politician?”
Surprised, not expecting a
question at that moment, I flummoxed. Gathering my wit, I passed him a smile and
replied “He is none of these”.
The answer wasn’t sufficing to
quench his curiosity, he questioned again - “How is he followed by a colossal
crowd?”
Confused how to explain as he
would never have encountered any such situation, I tried explaining “The person
on the screen is an agitator, demanding reservation for his Patel community”.
The guy was able to figure out
the two acquainted words, one was ‘reservation’, and other was ‘Patel’ which he
related with few of his Indian-origin friends in US, studying in Universities, employed
or businessmen. He asked hesitantly with an insinuation- “Is this for any
Reservation in a Hotel or a Flight for Mr. Patel?”
Poor fellow was yet unaware of the
mighty ‘reservation’. I tried appeasing his curiosity with some explanation- “Socially
oppressed communities in India are provided reservation in Government institutions
for their amelioration.”
He exclaimed “What kind of
reservation are they provided?”
With mixed views on the reservation,
whether actually progressive or deteriorating for my country, I hesitantly said
“They have reservation against merits of general category people”.
No efforts of hiding his consternation
expressed by his wide open eyes, he grinned- “What is the reason behind such
partiality?”
I was really having sympathy with
him. Through his spectacles it was a partiality. He was unable to accept the ‘reservation’
our Government has always welcomed warmly. Considering his puzzled
condition, I provided him with a reason “Reservation protects the oppressed
people from social injustice and exploitation.”
Not agreeing with my statement, fiercely
he replied “Let me cite you an honest example of upheaval of oppressed communities
in America. Earlier, Africans were imported as slaves. In late 19th
century, after a series of protests for their rights, importing them for
slavery was banned by the law. But even after this, those who were already in
the country remained greatly oppressed. They suffered great humiliation and
discrimination. They escalated to their present conditions led by Jr. Martin
Luther King, who followed non-violent civil disobedience movement who was a
follower of Gandhi, he compared the African-Americans with the untouchables of
India. Most of all, he also demanded for the upgradation of the other oppressed
communities who were not blacks. He never demanded for any partisan reservation.
Now they are not among oppressed any more, have the voting rights and are as
equal as others.”
Defending my country’s opinion, I
proudly stated “In India, voting right is basic fundamental right of every
citizen, none can be devoid of. But the oppressed ones are also human beings and
indistinguishable from other Indians, there is no reason they should be
humiliated. There are special provisions for them to cope with their
oppression, so they may gain social reputation”.
Somewhat carelessly, belittling my
words he answered “If they look like you then actually you have no grounds to
incorporate an unfair law in your Constitution. African-Americans were clearly
distinguishable and actually this was the reason for discrimination. They were
even devoid of voting rights and were humiliated. But lawfully they overcame
their oppression themselves. They still appear distinct from white Americans,
but are nowhere lagging behind and that too ‘without any reservation’. Even we
have an African Origin American now as our President.”
I tried defending the reservation
vaguely by explaining “We have reserved seats for oppressed even in constituent
assembly, but these communities have suffered greatly for hundreds of years”.
Giving an ironical surprise look
with his dancing eyes, he crudely stated- “Oh, does it really matters? What
actually matter is the present situation and what can be done to get the people
out of oppressed state. You are even tagging them as oppressed with such
reservation. This would not serve any fair consequences, but will be regressing.
Also, you will lose the eligible candidates by your so called ‘reservation’.”
Break was over, our debate ended
up fragmentarily. Even after his lengthy stand, how can I neglect the mightiness
of reservation which covers 49.5% of quota? Which exceeded 55% in Andhra Pradesh,
Rajasthan and some states, but restricted by the High court in 2005. Tamil Nadu
still is debatable on its reservation policies, continuing their 69% quota. In
1951, court provided a judgement that caste-based reservations were violating
the constitution. To make the judgement inoperative, there was amendment in the
constitution. Having the cover of constitution, some states catapulted to 69%
of reservation. This unconstrained leap was checked by implementing the cap of
50% on reservation in 1963.
Proposed reservations for
economically poor people among the forward castes was held illegitimate by the
court in 1992, while there are still discussions on excluding or including the
creamy layer. In the same year, court disregarded ‘promotions’ to be considered
under reservation. As expected, in response again amendment was made in
constitution to make the judgement void, which even mentions that the backlog
vacancies are considered as special category and would not be under any cap of
50%.
Again and again court delivered judgement
against reservation, repeatedly amendments were made in the constitution as an
answer to overrule the court. Legacy of Judicial powers was challenged, politicians
were mending it their own ways. This reservation sought for the politicians as
a tool of politics is not justified anyhow.
Returning to the scene of
classroom. The lecture was over with an end to classes that day. My friend and
I were leaving the class together. Looking at me, he sarcastically questioned
“By the way, is there any positive outcome of your so called ‘reservation’?”
Joyed, feeling my side weigh, I immediately
answered “Yes, these oppressed people are studying and working with us in
Government institutions.”
He clarified offhandedly “I meant
to ask that are they oppressed yet, or had they overcome the situation in such
a long period of reservation?”
The question left me with a deep
silence, to delve into the thoughts with a direction. “Oh yes, if they are
still oppressed, proves that reservation is no good. And if they gained a
social reputation, then what is the need of continuing meaningless
reservation”. My eyes sparkled with brilliance even after losing the debate.
My friend smiled and added a
humor- “Nobody wants to lose their special provisions. It would be better if India
proceeds in reverse direction and gradually covers all the castes categorized
as reserved. Ultimately it will extract the roots of reservation- Everyone
being under that 50%.” Saying this he
winked at me. Both of us smiled and he departed.
There was a great sense in his
humor. Considering the present situation, it is ironically a great solution. Many
castes are presenting forward to be categorized under reserved categories
proving their oppressed conditions. This would actually help in getting out of
this nettle of reservation. One may wonder why. It is actually not possible to
step back in the policy of reservation, or every reserved category would be on
the verge of revolting heavily. Gradually all the castes should demand reservation
and finally complete population will be covered in this 50%. Indirectly,
reservation will come to a happy ending with no more amendments in constitution
giving chances to the politicians to deep root their seats over the foundation
of this policy. This will eventually free us from the evil claws of
reservation.
- Dr. Richa Singhania Agrawal
- Dr. Richa Singhania Agrawal
No comments:
Post a Comment